The Lefts and Islam - Together back to the middle Ages
“We stand for the Freedom of Speech, Opinion and Expression.” It had been the norm in the geographical location of Europe. Or had it?
"We are going to make sure it is marked on people's records with the police to make sure they classify Islamophobia as a hate crime. We are going to change the law on this so we make it absolutely clear of our abhorrence of hate crime and Islamophobia. It will be the first time that the police will record Islamophobic attacks across the country."
That quote above would appear like something we would expect from people like PM Erdogan from Turkey who stated: "Islamophobia should be recognised as a crime." Wouldn’t it? Unfortunately not, as that quote actually came from the Labour candidate Ed Miliband, who would have basically sentenced Winston Churchill to prison for his views on Islam.
Miliband is a politician from the Labour Party in the midst of Europe where Human Rights have thrived, same-sex marriage has evolved and people can criticise Christianity and Atheism, Politicians and Political Parties.
Never had the Europeans used the word "Christianophobia" before because those days when Christians were allowed to torture and kill have come to an end long time ago, going through the years of enlightenment and the era of secularism. There may be complaints or some opposition from faith groups when one of their leaders is mocked or criticised in cartoons but nobody threatens to cut off another person’s head for that. But now despite the knowledge about the will for many Muslims to defend their faith through violence, and religious leaders of Islam even calling for the execution of its opponents, critiques and apostates, some politicians in the West want to support that too by calling for the criminalisation of people opposing that religion called Islam.
Misconception of Islam
Islam is `the religion of peace' because:
• the Arabic word Islam is derived from the Arabic word "Al-Salaam" which means peace.
It might seem strange to think of this as a misconception, but in fact it is. The root word of Islam is "al-silm" which means "submission" or "surrender." It is understood to mean "submission to Allah." In spite of whatever noble intention has caused many a Muslim to claim that Islam is derived primarily from peace, this is not true. Allah says in the Qur'an (translated):
[2:136] Say (O Muslims): We believe in Allah and that which is revealed to us and that which was revealed to Abraham, and Ishmael, and Isaac, and Jacob, and the tribes, and that which Moses and Jesus received, and that which the prophets received from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and to Him we have surrendered. [Arabic "Muslimoon"]
(Source Wikipedia)
A secondary root word of Islam may be "Al-Salaam" (peace), however the text of the Qur'an makes it clear that Allah clearly is intended to be the focus of this way of life, a life fully devoted to that god. This entails submission to Allah at all times, in times of peace, war, ease, or difficulty.
Over the years we can observe that many defenders of Islam who are non-Muslims who are turning a blind eye on the creeping Islamisation of Europe actually belong to the left wing and green political party.
Maybe one reason for this could be the short sighted aim to get more voters. If Europe receives more and more Muslims who become naturalised and become citizens of a country, this group would be potential voters for those parties. Why this is short sighted? Because firstly, those parties will eventually lose support when Islam grows because the left supports Human Rights, same sex marriage and woman rights, values that Islam and its parties strongly oppose. Secondly, Islam is not democratic and just uses democracy to gain power. And thirdly, the left is losing its fundamental values that it used to stand for.
I will now list those leftist values those parties are losing, hence no longer acting the way they were founded for:
The Dialectical materialism, founded by Karl Marx, a stance integrated into the left wing parties and movements, means basically to walk the physical world without gods, without God-nationals where imams and priests would tell us what to do and what not! It’s the world alone we have to value with the physicists, engineers, scientists and many others.
It were mainly the Lefts who resigned in masses from the Christian churches during the last 30 years, and now those same Lefts are running to the opposite direction for over 15 years getting cosy and supportive with the most aggressive religion in the world, Islam!
This will be a historical paradox! Historians 30 years from now will question how the Lefts actually left the world of physics and instead went out fighting for the ones who base the world on deities by calculated restfulness with religious fascism digging their own philosophical grave. Are they saying good bye to Dialectical materialism? Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels would be speechless if they were still able to observe this.
Left Green Party MP Mr. Ströbele repeated constantly: "Saddam had no chemical weapons and Bush invented them so that he could attack them." But in 1988, came 18 aircrafts with chemical weapons from Iraq, leaving behind 8000 deaths in the Kurdish cities of Kirkuk and Helabscha.
There is too much false talk from nearly all political parties about moderate Muslims and extremist Islamists. A typical political correctness game is played to persuade the ordinary citizens that there are just a few Muslims coming and growing in Europe.
"Trust" in "moderates" until the day X comes? We were able to recently observe what happened in Mosul: When the IS arrived, they were received with flags and Muslim neighbours did not protect the Christians with whom they lived together for years side by side but allowed IS to hunt the Christians down resulting in the killing and slaughtering of the said group.
The Netherlands, a country I used to know as open and liberal, is changing its colour in a dramatic way, and if not stopped, will no longer be recognised for what it is known for with its freedom and democracy.
In 2006 Minister of Justice Piet Hein Donner suggested the Netherlands might accept Sharia law in a constitutional manner. He stated: "It is a sure certainty for me: if two thirds of all Netherlanders tomorrow would want to introduce Sharia, then this possibility must exist. Could you block this legally? It would also be a scandal to say 'this isn't allowed! The majority counts. That is the essence of democracy." With this statement he indirectly confirms that democracy would fail if such forces rise to a certain level. End of 2012 the number of Muslims was estimated to be around 4% of the total Dutch population according to the Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics.
Is the Patriotic Europeans against the Islamisation of the Occident(PEGIDA) mistaken when holding their Monday marches? Lefts, but mainly conservatives, who are self-proclaimed intellectual humanists (Do-gooders) who often without background knowledge argue that there will be no Islamization in Germany. (Islam is the largest non-Christian religion in the country. The majority of Muslims in Germany are of Turkish origin (63.2%), followed by those from Pakistan, countries of the former Yugoslavia, Arab countries, Iran and Afghanistan. Total: 3.6 million (4%), of which 1 million (1.1%) has German citizenship already.) Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Germany#Islam
The founding of PEGIDA was only due to the present situation in Germany and other European countries in regards to Islam and is in no way set up by the few young Nazis in the country. Nevertheless and therefore, admittedly, a part of young people within tend to Nazism but only because there is no other group resisting the Islamization of Germany and Europe. The majority of the PEGIDA followers are non-violent, and rather silently marchers against Islamization. The cheap Nazi labelling or characterisation of anti Islamization lobbyists does no longer work. The ones who are still trying that tactic are the SPD (Social Democratic Party Germany), CDU (Christian Democratic Union) and the Green Party and the TV stations ARD and ZDF, who are regulated by public law.
The “Patriotic Europeans against the Islamisation of the Occident” - known under its German acronym PEGIDA - continues to gain momentum. More in the following press release:
I will refer for the meantime to the press, while the free press still exists. We can bypass the main stream media to look behind their facades.
Facts about Islamization can be found in several publications, but I am going to point out one, the German well known magazine called Der Spiegel (The Mirror):
Der Spiegel, No 32/12, December 2012:Prof. Spuler-Stegemann: "The Islamist movement, led by Gülen, is the most dangerous movement in Germany."
Quote of the Gülen: "With the patience of a spider we wait until we act hard; we need to enter the system, and its arteries!”
DER SPIEGEL 32/2012:Muslim girls had reported: "The Khawaja in Germany go for years from family to family, and advise to have as many children as possible, so that in 20 years they can elect a Muslim Chancellor".
Already headlined in March 2007 by Der Spiegel: "Mecca Germany - the silent Islamization".
Muammar al-Gaddafi, the Libyan President, rightly predicted: “There are signs that Allah will grant victory to Islam in Europe without swords, without guns, without conquest. We don’t need terrorists, we don’t need homicide bombs. The 50+ million Muslims in Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.”
http://viral.buzz/powerful-video-islam-will-take-over-the-world-in-50-years/
Statistics in Germany state: Muslim families have on average 3.6 children, German non-Muslims had 1.1 children! Here are more statistics: http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Muslim_Statistics_-_Population#Germany
The problem is not what we can call modern times regulated immigration politics; it’s the uncontrolled flood of illegal immigrants, not by qualification, not by invitation, but by the systematic overruling of the European system that is blinded and paralyzed by the pictures of refugees.
How come only Europe and its countries is criticised when wanting to defend its borders, being called nationalistic, Nazis, racist? When other countries do the same, nobody even cares. This sounds like a conspiracy, but it smells like a plan, like intentionally leading the masses to believe and think that Islamisation is a myth, that there is a difference between Islamists and Muslims, and that when you oppose this picture you are considered the bad guy.
It is clear as never before that Islam is the negative force all around the globe and now rising in Europe. The twisted projection about people who hate is clearly sampled with how wrong this is portrayed. Here are some clear and obvious examples:
On the 6th of May 2002, nine days before the Dutch general election, Pim Fortuyn, a Dutch politician, was assassinated by Volkert van der Graaf in Hilversum, North Holland. After Fortuyn's death, Dutch politicians, including former Minister for Integration and Immigration Rita Verdonk and Geert Wilders, increased in popularity and prominence.
In February 2013, Denmark’s leading Islam critic survives a life and death struggle. At his home in Copenhagen, he opened the door to a man pretending to be a mailman handing over a package, the man drew a gun starting to shoot at Mr. Lars Hedegaard.
“Theo van Gogh was murdered in Amsterdam on Tuesday, November 2. The 47-year-old film director and publicist was shot and stabbed several times by his assassin on the streets of the Dutch capital. Van Gogh had made no secret of his sympathy for the policies and restrictive immigration policies of the party led by the right-wing populist Pim Fortuyn, who was himself murdered in May 2002.”
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2004/11/gogh-n10.html
In response, not only are the left parties downplaying the problem of Islam, like they are inventing claims that there are differences between moderate Islam and extreme Islam, and they are supporting demands from Muslim communities like the separation of women and men in swimming facilities (I will come back to this later in the article), introduction of Muslim holidays, and allowing women to cover themselves completely in public. Seemingly the German government suddenly doesn’t seem to remember a law in Germany called “Vermummungsverbot” or in English “Anti-masking law”. Anti-maskor anti-masking laws refer to legislative or penal initiatives that seek to stop individuals from concealing their faces, who do so often for political or religious purposes. Even though it clearly states religious, suddenly with Islam the law is not enforced.
Islam is not just a religion, but it demands world domination, political influence and to have the say about daily life and its laws. Europe has come to a point where it was able to separate church and state, that’s how we know it, but it’s in fact the separation of religion and state.
“The separation of church and state is described as the distance in the relationship between organized religion and the nation state. It may refer to creating a secular state, with or without explicit reference to such separation, or to changing an existing relationship of church involvement in a state (disestablishment).” (Source: Wikipedia)
In France Laïcité, a product of French history and philosophy was formalized in a 1905 law providing for the separation of church and state, that is, the separation of religion from political power.
In Italy the principle of separation of church and state is enshrined in Article 7 of the Constitution.
So far so good, but let’s see the situation in Germany:
The German constitution guarantees freedom of religion,but there is not a complete separation of church and state in Germany.
Maybe that’s one of the reasons why illegal Muslim migrants target Germany, or are manipulated to do so!? No complete separation of church and state can easily be adapted to no complete separation of state and Islam. How convenient; and Germany has willingly accepted to receive the 800000 refugees!
The left parties like the social democrats and the green party is basically always referring to the opponents of Islam and its growing influence as right wing or far right wing extremism, throwing these people and the group is not even small. The PVV in The Netherlands counts to be the strongest supported party in the country. Are all extremists? Opposing extremism doesn’t mean one is an extremist. We must not forget that the right wing parties are nationalist parties with a tendency to Nazism, and that is a totally different ideology and motivation. Opposing them is seen as correct, as they are extreme, but opposing totalitarian Islam suddenly not?
The Social Democratic Party parliamentary leader Opperman reacted after the Paris attacks with the following statement. “These are killers, not Muslims,” He yet didn’t explain why he separated his terminologies.
The Social Democratic Party has proven to be a political heavyweight in enforcing fundamental goals of Islam, as it advocates the gender segregation in sports and swimming lessons, wants to ban school trips during Ramadan and wants even the most legitimate criticism of Islam to be called "racism", "Islam hatred" and "intolerance" by brand, while they are considering to have further criticism of Islam even criminalized. Thus they would have met the principal of Islam - because in its States where Sharia is the law, criticism of Islam and the Prophet Muhammed result in the death penalty.
Let me finalise with a statement from a Social Democratic leader, who basically insulted the social democratic ideology.
A little surprise by Frank-Walter Steinmeier emerged when he concluded his speech in front of 300 students at the El Manar University in Tunis. He wanted to put his “Foreign Minister” title aside and say something personal: "Even I myself live my faith: I am a Christian," he emphasizes in Islamic Tunisia. He said to be "quite active in the Protestant Church Germany", and of course "I do not leave my religion at the door from when I go to my Office of the Minister". For confirmation he cited the 33rd surah of the Koran (not the bile), "God has not placed two hearts in man’s chest, but one.”
Just pause for a few seconds and think about this… let it sink in.
I would call this Alarming!
The same politician also stated: "Islamist terrorism is our common enemy."
But where does Islamist terrorism come from? Of course it’s from Islam and the Koran. The Koran is the book for the Muslims. Muslims worship the Koran. Islamists explain their acts from the Koran. If the so called moderate Muslims oppose the Koran, then they betray and insult Islam, as much as the non-Muslims do when criticising Islam. But leaving behind the Islam religion is considered an apostasy which is subject to execution. It’s all the same. We may differentiate between active and passive Muslims, but basically they all follow and love the religion if Islam.
It’s not even 100 years ago that the Social Democrats stood strong for the equality of women and later for the LGBT community and children. Yet in supporting Islam it’s basically doing the opposite.
“You can fool some people some of the time but you can’t fool all of them all of the time.”
Freedom fighter Geert Wilders has been much vilified and smeared in the press, but continues to build strong support and votes amongst his people.
Muslims are too smart and conflict experienced to introduce sharia overnight. As long as they are still in the minority, they always ask for new special rights from the society. Those special rights will increase and expand, until they can make their final blast; the introduction of Sharia law.
Current Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan is on the record by stating “We are Sharia-ists”; “We will turn Istanbul into Medina”; “I am the Imam of Istanbul”; “Our only goal is an Islamic State”.
The Social Democratic Party Germany and Alliance '90 / The Greens, are in favour of serious negotiations with the possible target of joining the EU. The Left Party (Die Linken) is for the accession.
The Social Democrats, Labour Parties and Green Parties will one day look back and realise their mistake; but that time will be too late because then they will be either losing one election after the other or will be about to get their head chopped off, along with the Christians, Jews and Atheists or Agnostics in society.
If the founders of the Social Democracy could one see what is happening to their ideology… you may make your own conclusion yourself.
By Thomas Fleckner
Comments powered by CComment