Yesterday on Wednesday the 7th of October, Angela Merkel had an opportunity to talk to Germany, exclusively and uninterrupted. The interview was featured on the ARD talkshow "Anne Will" at 21.45 hours. The result was just as if this interview was not needed. Germany lacks harsh and provoking interviewers with the demand for realism and neutral projection towards all positions.
Angela Merkel stated on "Anne Will" at the ARD: "The admission stop does not exist... and then it's just the task simply, that one approaches in a way that one succeeds, and only then one can succeed, and I have no doubt."
What she is saying is basically nothing but, to leave the doors open, and Germany will make it somehow, but she doesn't say how.
Further she said: "I am proud about us welcoming the refugees friendly. I don't want to be a part of a competition who welcomes the refugees worst."
She totally misses the actual point here by in reality underlining, that she is proud welcoming all the misbehaving, islamic and economical refugees from the Balkan, Africa and other Middle East countries. She is welcoming Syrians who come from safe countries as Turkey, who have no need to continue to travel to Germany.
A typical clapping reaction from the audience when she speaks. One she was invited exclusively, so no opposition to challenge her,a soft moderator and an audience that is cherry picked to favour all that Merkel says.
But here is the suicidal statement she made: "...it is not in our power how many people come to Germany." (says one of the most powerful politicians) and further... "We can't close the borders. We have a 3000km borderline. We would have to build a fence. There is no admission stop."
She presents the answer but says it can't be done, to close the borders.
The tip of the iceberg yet was reached when Merkel stated: "No, surely not." when it came to the question of there is a ceiling, a limit to its capacity. Hence according to Merkel, Germany can welcome even more refugees.
Meanwhile more and more people oppose Merkel and her politics, people go to the streets. People are unhappy, in fear and in opposition, but Merkel ignores all. It's her agenda or nothing. And she still has time to destabalise Europe, as in 2017 are the next national elections in Germany.
Angela Merkel is not acting in a democratic way in regards to EU politics and the european refugee and illegal immigrants crisis, and there are some points needed to show about this:
1: Merkel is mostly showing herself with Hollande or Juncker, but mostly with Hollande at her hand.
2: Merkel always talks about "we have to" "we can't accept" "don't listen to them". She talks for 28 countries, representing them without asking them.
3: Merkel invites refugees without limits. She does it, without asking the other EU member states if they would allow refugees to pass through their countries, and pointing out the possibility, due to open borders, that illegal immigrants may pass German borders into The Netherlands or Belgium for example.
4: Merkel decides with 2 countries over 28.
5: She tells citizens to "not listen" to people who oppose Islam and the islamisation of Europe, as if they were parasites or just few. The EU is not democratic at this stage. It's a German, French, Luxembourg dictate. Nothing more, nothing less.
Still EU politicians portray Islam as a peaceful religion, ignoring the violence and political influence it is already bringing. We just need to look into the Middle East, where there is never peace due to the Muslim tribal disputes and religious fights between Islam, Jewism and Christianity. Now Europe thinks it can harbour this unreast peacefully within its borders and ignore the islamic battels on its grounds?
The Muslim mind set is very insular, as it's just focused on protecting Islam, hence a "culture" of defence. It rejects to engage with the ideas, development and research of the so called "non-believers", I say so called, as for Islam even other religions are labelled as non-belief. Islam loves to portray itself as victim and conqueror at the same time, where ever it acts by location. Further it is too busy with itself, it's tribal disputes and political influence taking. One can blame the rise of Islam on the decline of birth rates in the West, but the West should hold more intelligent solutions at hand, rather than just opening its gates to the most incompatible. Controlled and qualifried immigration from Asia would not raise an eyebrow, as there is and has not been any problem with Asian immigrants, as they integrate, work and don't have threatning demands. If Europe can pay billions to entertain refugees and illegal immigrants, why can't they for example attrackt parents with higher child benifits to stop the decline of its polulation?
The system is failing through the loss of ideology, the loss of encouraging families to keep society going,and the loss of leadership. Lack of interest is one of the downfalls. Not being interested is the same as ignorance. This is where politics seems to favour their citisens. They want non patriotic and non critical people, where the latest sport event, the latest drama sries and the latest celebrity gossip is more important that the future and identity of the country and the continent.
There is a war in Europe, and nobody sees it.
By Thomas Fleckner
The full interview, in German, can be found here:
Comments powered by CComment