Germany – A hippie state lead by its emotions

No, this is not an i-Arose invention; but in September 2015, the beginning of the present illegal migrant crisis, Professor Anthony Glees a prominent commentator on European affairs, has described Germany as "a hippie state, being led by its emotions." His words, describing Germany's role in the migrant crisis were already then making headlines on websites and in newspapers. Professor Anthony Glees, who is the Director of the Centre for Security and Intelligence Studies at the University of Buckingham, spoke to Newsday.

This expression doesn’t only show the controversy Germany is in, but also the illogical and unnatural combinations and compromises it is executing and calling for. For example, hippies rejected mainstream organized religion in favor of a more personal spiritual experience. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sufism often resonated with hippies, as they were thought to be less rule-bound, and less likely to be associated with existing monotheistic religions. Some hippies embraced neo-paganism, especially Wicca. By the 1960s, western interest in Hindu spirituality and yoga reached its peak.

So Germany wants to prove the world that they can do better and always good after the dark era of the 3^rd Reich. Infiltrated with guilt and riddled with shame, and consciously and unconsciously manipulated to hate the German identity; the seemingly tolerant self-made modeled main stream showcase of a softened center, a left and green and liberal mixture has come to a point of absurdity and artificially existence.

We all reject the dictate of the past, nobody, and that includes the parties as AfD in Germany (Alternative for Germany) and the PVV (Party for Freedom Netherlands) i.e. That is why, and only because of that, the present political executions are creating an irreparable fallen Europe.

The unnatural combinations and compromises are not done within Europe, to strengthen inter-European relations and resolve differences; no, they are done to eliminate Europe in how we know it; a Europe of freedom, humanity and peace. The illegal import of an Islamic culture is not just a threat to democracy, freedom and humanity, but also to peace. We just have to observe the middle east and we receive all answers.

Already in 2006 Professor Anthony Glees wrote an article in the Independent arguing for internment without trial and the overturning of the European Convention on Human Rights. Glees argued that, 'Academics should think the unthinkable,' and 'not be blinkered by political correctness.' He argued that the European Convention on Human Rights had 'gone too far' and was 'deeply flawed'.

In the closing paragraph of the article Glees called for action 'against extremism' and urged Britain's Muslims to leave the country:

Liberal democracy will be easily destroyed if we do not act against extremism. We give our enemies the weapons they need to destroy us. We need to be more mindful that there is a threshold that should not be crossed. Not everything is permissible. Wearing the niqab is saying we don't want to be British. Forty per cent of British Muslims say they want to live under sharia law. That is unacceptable. They should go to a country with sharia law. (Source: Powerbase)

This is yet one of many examples of warnings and statements by highly educated people; and nobody seems to bother.

Europe is following a tactic lead by politicians as Angela Merkel, Mark Rutte, Jean Claude Juncker, etc. The idea is pursuing what they have started, make fake compromises to appease the opposition they just dismiss by calling them “far right” or “political extremists”, racists or Nazis. All logically wrong and irrational; but it sounds good, because nobody wants to be called out “bad” in society, or to be associated with the bad. The newest development is what we can observe in Germany. The government was about to collapse under the pressure of the coalition partner CSU, the Bavarian counterpart of the nation-wide CDU, the party of Angela Merkel. The minister for interior took an AfD stance, by saying that illegal migrants should be rejected entry. Merkel did not want that, so a deep internal fight begun. We must know that the state of Bavaria will have elections soon, and the CSU, always the strongest party there, is weakening, and all because of the AfD party. Bavarians are known to have more national pride and identity.

Rarely have CSU and CDU disputed in the asylum issue, at times, the Union was apparently facing the split. Now Horst Seehofer and Angela Merkel have come to an agreement. According to the Federal Chancellor and Federal Interior Minister, transit centers will in future ensure that no asylum seekers come to Germany who are already registered in another EU country. But is this really a new agreement?

In principle, there are already some sort of transit centers in Germany. Namely at certain airports, such as in Munich. The so-called airport procedure checks asylum seekers who come to Germany from a country classified as safe. This is exactly what is being done at airports already. The airport procedure allows accelerated decisions and rejections. So, nothing new here!

The compromise between the CDU and CSU yet stipulates, that the "transit centers" will only be set up once agreements have been concluded with Austria and Italy. But the new right-wing government in Rome has no interest whatsoever in taking back registered refugees, and their representatives have said that very clearly. So, what happens if there is no agreement, ergo no "transit centers" can be built? Anyone asking these questions in the government hears nothing but eloquent excuses.

There is no plan B. Not even the concrete idea of ​​finding a solution on the model of the Turkey deal (which swap one refugee for the other and additionally transfer a lot of money). There is only hope that everything will go well somehow (The typical Merkel strategy to sit and sit and wait and wait, until things resolve by itself or are no longer questioned). The huge relief that this daydream that the last moment federal government has been saved from the falling apart, is just temporal, as there is opposition; real opposition, hence the AfD. In a movie that would be a nice punch line. In the government of the most powerful country in Europe it is an indictment; a shame.

Ten thousands of people have died in the sees on their way to Europe; and why? Because the EU and its illusional leaders are supporting the illegal migration, the human traffickers and the flooding of European countries.

Europe’s open border policy was created for the people and the trade of all its belonging nations, not for externals. We all know that immigration is necessary, but in a matter that serves the continent and develops it. The mass immigration of mostly uneducated, even illiterate and cultural so much different people is of no help, but a burden for the people, the social welfare system and the tax payers. Whilst highly educated people from Asia, who don’t want to overturn the system, are over and over applying for legal migration, economic migrants, criminals and Islamic people come in without hindrance.

Angela Merkel is power hungry, as much as the EU body of Brussels is. They don’t care about identity, patriotism or western values; but they have not yet succeeded. Countries as Hungary, Italy and Austria show us that there is a possibility for U-Turn.

 By Thomas Fleckner